96 Plants...

[flipster]

An interesting read:

 

http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/sent_remarks/s...nic_anthony.htm

[Guest BudWaver]

not bad eh..considering he had priors...

 

96 plants is insane...but good on him

 

makes ya wonder what someone with 4 plants would get?

[crud]

good to see that he got off!,but knowing my luck,i'd go in with no prior's & get 2 years for having 4 plants! that just seems to be the way the law works i think,the more times you front before them,the less of a sentence you recieve,i think they like to make an example out of some people.

[flipster]

It seems the number of plants in alot of the cases were just one factor affecting the outcome.

 

Pretty much all cannabis related cases recieved suspended sentences - unless there was something like selling even small amounts of amphetamines involved, which will see you spending time with Bubba clenching like you've never clenched before. So let that be a warning to you kiddies.

 

Do a search for 'cannabis' at www.courts.sa.gov.au if you're interested in reading more. I think URLs for other states would follow a similar format too.

Edited February 2, 2004 by flipster

[dirty]

What an awesome outcome, that dude is pretty lucky!

I wonder how much was spent on legal fees?

[skankmaster]

Well i am pretty sure he was going to sell the goods as which pothead grows 96 plants for his own consumptiion??? i think not. HOWEVER if there were no scales lying about, no vast sums of cash or (new) weed baggies, no flash cars or bikes or other gear- how could they prove he was intending to sell? Good on him...

You may get caught with 4 plants but have siome other "incriminating" evidence about which could fuck ya.... Maybe the judge had a good root the night before, or maybe he is a pothead himself. Who knows?