Latest poll shows 'yes' to proposition 19 is currently AHEAD&#

[Paladin]

Link here:

 

http://elections.firedoglake.com/2010/07/2...zing-marijuana/

 

Full (unformatted) text follows:

 

Proposition 19, which would legalize, tax and regulate marijuana for adults over 21 years old, is currently winning by a wide margin among California voters according to a new PPP poll. The measure is supported by 52% of voters while opposed by only 36%.

 

Prop 19 PPP (7/23-25)

Support 52%

Oppose 36%

Not Sure 12%

 

This is the largest margin of support we have seen from recent polling on Prop 19. Interestingly, the poll found support among African Americans to be extremely high. From PPP blog:

 

Democrats are more likely to throw their support behind the prop than Republicans. 62% of Democrats, 37% of Republicans and 55% of Independents support Prop 19.

 

African-Americans are the strongest supporters of Prop 19; 68:32, followed by Whites who support it 53:37.

 

Those are surprisingly high numbers among African Americans. A SurveyUSA poll from earlier this month had African Americans on average about as likely to support Prop 19 as whites. Significantly, a small percentage of African Americans said they were certain to oppose it.

 

Both this PPP Poll and the SurveyUSA poll directly contradict a Field Poll (PDF) which had African Americans dramatically less supportive of Prop 19 than whites in California. It would seem that there is a problem accurately gauging support for Prop 19 among the African American community. This might be due to the taboo nature of this specific policy issue resulting from the government spending huge amounts of money on anti-marijuana propaganda for decades. It is possible that African Americans, and possibly other ethnic groups, don’t feel comfortable telling pollsters their actual position on legalizing cannabis.

 

Plurality of American adults supports legalizing marijuana.

 

In addition, there is more good news about support for marijuana legalization from Rasmussen Reports. For the first time, their poll of all American adults has a plurality supporting legalization: 43% think marijuana should be legalized while 42% think it should remain illegal. That is a significant improvement from a similar Rasmussen poll just a little over a year ago, which found 41% supporting legalization and 49% opposed. It is possible that Prop 19, by bringing the debate to the forefront, is starting to noticeably move national opinions by forcing people to take some time to actually think about the issue.

 

The most interesting part of the Rasmussen poll is that a solid majority thinks legalization is a real possibility in the relatively short term.

 

65% believe it is at least somewhat likely marijuana will be legalized in the United States in the next 10 years. Just 28% do not expect this to happen. Those numbers include 29% who say it is Very Likely pot will be legal in the next 10 years and five percent (5%) who say it is Not At All Likely.

 

It is important to point out that the subset of American adults who actually vote tends to be older and less supportive of legalization than the general public, so we probably have not yet reached the point where a plurality of the all important “likely voters” supports legalization, but at the current rate that point could be reached soon.

[jimbojones5678]

unreal - that's heading in the right direction

 

Jimbo

[snooch]

A little bit off topic, but it seems this has been lost in the whole Prop 19 (just doesn't have the same ring to it as 420, but anyway). I just find this really disturbing, not least because people like Feinstein keep getting elected into positions of power.

 

 

Pot advocates fear bill could mandate ‘enhanced penalties’ for medical edibles

By Stephen C. Webster

Thursday, July 29th, 2010 -- 9:21 pm

In the name of saving children from candy-flavored methamphetamine, the U.S. appears on the verge of mandating more than a year in jail for anyone who cooks up a batch of pot brownies.

A bill by California Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein that has recently reached the Senate floor has cannabis advocacy groups concerned that potent, medical-grade edible products would become a higher crime carrying weighter sentences, ostensibly to protect children from ingesting strawberry-flavored meth.

The bill is the Saving Kids from Dangerous Drugs Act, which, according to Feinstein, "sends a strong and clear message to drug dealers – if you target our children by peddling candy-flavored drugs, there will be a heavy price to pay."

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) co-sponsors the bill. The full text is available online [PDF link].

"Flavored meth – with child-friendly names like Strawberry Quick – is designed to get people to try it a few times," Feinstein declared in a media advisory. "It’s all about hooking young people, and we have to stop this practice before it grows any further. So, this legislation will increase the criminal penalties for anyone who markets candy-flavored drugs to our youth – by imposing on them the same enhanced penalties applied to dealers who distribute drugs to minors."

"New techniques and gimmicks to lure our kids into addiction are around every corner. Candy flavored meth is the latest craze used by drug dealers," Senator Grassley added. "Research has shown time and again that if you can keep a child drug-free until they turn 20, chances are very slim that they will ever try or become addicted. This makes it all the more important that we put an end to the practice of purposely altering illegal drugs to make them more appealing to young people."

Cannabis advocacy blog "Toke of the Town" retorted: "Since there is no national trend toward lacing candy and other edibles with meth or any other drug besides cannabis, this bill clearly targets legitimate medical marijuana dispensaries, caregivers and patients in states that have legalized it as medicine."

And what sort of "enhanced penalty are we talking about? "[A] term of imprisonment [...] shall be not less than one year," the legislation states.

In the same breath, however, the bill adds: "This subparagraph shall not apply to any offense involving [five] grams or less of marihuana."

Should Feinstein's bill become law, the stipulation of five grams or less would absolutely lead prosecutions to level claims as to how much plant matter was used in the preparation of various drug-laced concoctions, which could be a highly subjective science.

Interestingly, the legislation gives no preferred mode of calculating the correlation of the plant matter's weight and the actual, tangible drug effect and content of the finished product, seemingly leaving a drastic space for ambiguity and interpretation.

However, she also opposes Proposition 19, California's marijuana legalization initiative, alleging that it would tie the hands of law enforcement, preventing officers from making stops and arrests of drivers stoned on marijuana. Feinstein even signed a ballot argument with Mothers Against Drunk Driving, citing specifically stoned school bus drivers as the principle threat to post-legalized society.

"Let's assess her argument point by point," began L.A. Times writer Paul Armentano. "First, Proposition 19 explicitly states that it will not amend or undermine existing state law criminalizing motorists who operate a vehicle while impaired by pot. Driving under the influence of marijuana is already illegal in California, and violators are vigorously prosecuted. This fact will not change under the initiative.

"Second, Proposition 19 in no way undermines federal drug-free workplace rules, just as the state's 14-year experience with legalized medical marijuana has not done so. Further, it does not limit the ability of employers to sanction or fire employees who show up to work under the influence of pot. Just as a private or public employer today may dismiss workers for being impaired by legal alcohol, employers in the future will continue to be able to fire employees who arrive to work under the influence of marijuana."

"Some medical marijuana users are so sick that they are unable to smoke their medicine and must eat it in baked goods or lozenges," pleaded activist group Students for Sensible Drug Policy. "They are already breaking federal law and risking prosecution but if S. 258 passes, the penalties they face would double.

"Please write your two United States Senators today and urge them to defeat this heartless bill."

The act was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in mid-June and is awaiting a vote by the Senate at-large.

 

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0729/cannabis-...edical-edibles/