Jump to content
  • Sign Up

What About The Average Dope Smoker?


Recommended Posts

What About The Average Dope Smoker?

PR Cannazine

2 October 2008

http://pr.cannazine.co.uk/content/view/700/27/

 

The National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (NCPIC) are really starting to gain a reputation as another bunch of quacks pushing their own brand of junk science onto the community. And according to one Ozzie blogger "The Australian" is the perfect vehicle to publish their crap.

 

As usual, these organisations rely on a tiny fraction of the group they target and somehow make them the representatives of the whole group.

 

Why can’t some organisation come out with a rational, evidence based report that states the upside to cannabis use? Why the doom and gloom when we should be celebrating the fact that something as popular as cannabis is not damaging society like alcohol.

 

Surely it’s good news that only a tiny percentage of cannabis users are harmed and it’s those who overuse the drug that have the problems.

 

Just for once, I would love to see the headline, “Latest Research Shows Recreational Cannabis Use Is OK” with an explanation that heavy use, like heavy use of anything, will cause problems. I suppose that wouldn’t suit their agenda though or sell newspapers.

 

Depression, psychosis strike dope smokers

The Australian

September 2008

 

CANNABIS smokers are more likely to suffer depression, anxiety and psychosis than those people who take stimulants, according to Australian statistics suggesting the drug's toll on mental health has been underestimated.

 

The impact of amphetamines on mental state is well known but a new national report shows dope smokers display higher rates of several psychological symptoms when visiting their doctor.

 

Of patients who mentioned cannabis use to their GP, 48 per cent had a psychological problem, including 19 per cent with depression and 9 per cent with psychosis. Six per cent had anxiety.

 

Only 31 per cent of stimulant users reported similar problems, with significantly lower rates of all conditions, according to the latest bulletin released by the National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre in Sydney. Centre director Jan Copeland said the results confirmed the dangers of the drug, especially for the reported 300,000 Australians who smoked it daily.

 

"It was unexpected, given what we hear about amphetamine-related psychotic symptoms, but it goes to show what a terrible impact cannabis is having on users," Professor Copeland said. "The delusions, hallucinations and paranoia can be very distressing and people are feeling it."

 

The results, in data collected from 1000 randomly selected GPs, also revealed that mentioning cannabis use to a doctor was very rare, with the drug named in just 19,000 consultations nationwide each year. Users were more likely to be male, young, unemployed or on a low income and indigenous.

 

Reread the last paragraph:

 

The results, in data collected from 1000 randomly selected GPs, also revealed that mentioning cannabis use to a doctor was very rare, with the drug named in just 19,000 consultations nationwide each year. Users were more likely to be male, young, unemployed or on a low income and indigenous.

 

Have they even considered that patients don’t mention cannabis to their doctors because it isn’t a problem for them?

 

Those that do mention cannabis probably do have a problem and require help but this just reinforces what many experts have been saying for years ... recreational cannabis use is relatively harmless. Even the director of NCPIC agrees:

 

As with most drugs, most people do not experience major problems with occasional cannabis use. But for those that use regularly or heavily, problems can be major and have a significant negative impact on their lives.

-Professor Jan Copeland - National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (NCPIC)

 

And this from their website:

 

There are a range of health and social harms associated with cannabis use. Not everyone who uses the drug will experience great problems, but for those that do, cannabis can affect their life in a very negative way.

-NCPIC website

 

I wonder why this quote isn’t a headline in the Murdoch papers?

 

One of the great equalisers is the question:

 

Where are the bodies?

-Michael Gormly - Kings Cross Times.

 

Yes, if cannabis is so dangerous and so many people smoke it world wide, why are the institutions not full of cannabis inflicted patients? There is a simple answer to this and one that is avoided at all costs by the anti-cannabis zealots. Answer: Recreational cannabis use is not harmful.

 

The objectivity of research from NCPIC and co. needs to be examined for practicality in the real world. it seems there are daily reports coming out about the harms of cannabis but still that question cannot be answered ... where are the bodies?

 

Norman Swan, host of The Health Report on the ABC probed into this issue indirectly and interviewed Professor John Ioannidis from Tufts University in Boston about his paper, 'Why Most Published Research Findings Are False'. One of the interesting conclusion was that if you have an agenda in mind, you can produce a lot of supporting statistics but when applied to the real world, they have no effect.

 

The other interesting conclusion was that new, breakthrough research with no supporting history (i.e. most cannabis users get psychosis) is usually dismissed fairly quickly and cannot be proved in a clinical environment. On the other hand, research based on many prior reports (i.e. cannabis is fairly safe), has much more legitimacy because it has been proven in the physical world previously.

 

We will continue to be bombarded with alarming new research from those with an agenda and media outlets like The Australian will continue to print them. In the end though, the truth always wins out.

 

So once again, where are the bodies? SOURCE

 

About the author;

 

Terry Wright - Australia

I am a heroin addict. I am not homeless nor do I live in a crowded junkie house. I dwell in suburbia with my partner, two fluffy dogs and a cat. I have a mortgage, a car and go grocery shopping on Friday nights.

 

I don't break into houses or sell drugs to survive but rather I design computer information systems. Yes I work and I am considered a professional.

 

I was on methadone but I am now on slow release oral morphine which usually keeps me from using heroin. I don't smoke grass and rarely drink. I don't gamble, commit adultery or break the law (well most laws)... but I sometimes resort to heroin.

 

This site is dedicated to recognising heroin addiction as a complex medical issue and the need for a scientific heroin trial in Australia. It also aims to highlight the carnage caused by inappropriate drug policies and the ulterior agendas of the people who support them.

 

http://theaustralianheroindiaries.blogspot.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's more of the same-old-same-old isn't it?

 

We know the mainstream media have their own agendas . . . probably depends on who's lining their pockets I would imagine!

One of the interesting conclusion was that if you have an agenda in mind, you can produce a lot of supporting statistics but when applied to the real world, they have no effect

That's because most statistics are skewed to meet the agenda of those proffering them . . . and it's so easy to do, the government have been at it for years [and I know this from first hand experience in the Health Department and look at the state the Health Department/s of most states are in now, they've been like that for years but only NOW is some of the truth starting to leak out]!

 

As with most drugs, most people do not experience major problems with occasional cannabis use. But for those that use regularly or heavily, problems can be major and have a significant negative impact on their lives.

Professor Jan Copeland - National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (NCPIC)

And this from their website:

There are a range of health and social harms associated with cannabis use. Not everyone who uses the drug will experience great problems, but for those that do, cannabis can affect their life in a very negative way.

NCPIC website

Mmm, wonder where her HYPOCRITICAL oath is hanging [should be round her neck!]

 

And as for the . . .

I am a heroin addict. I am not homeless nor do I live in a crowded junkie house. I dwell in suburbia with my partner, two fluffy dogs and a cat. I have a mortgage, a car and go grocery shopping on Friday nights.

I don't break into houses or sell drugs to survive but rather I design computer information systems. Yes I work and I am considered a professional.

I was on methadone but I am now on slow release oral morphine which usually keeps me from using heroin. I don't smoke grass and rarely drink. I don't gamble, commit adultery or break the law (well most laws)... but I sometimes resort to heroin.

This site is dedicated to recognising heroin addiction as a complex medical issue and the need for a scientific heroin trial in Australia. It also aims to highlight the carnage caused by inappropriate drug policies and the ulterior agendas of the people who support them.

As one who worked in the front lines with Heroin addicts at Methadone Clinics [in both the cities and the suburbs] I can say that the spread of 'clients' was nigh on 50/50 [moreso in the suburban clinics though, the cities tended to hold more of the dealers and 'junkie' types] . . . 50% DID sell drugs, break into houses etc . . . and the other 50% WERE family men or women, living in suburbia, trying to hold down jobs . . . and yes, heroin addiction is or should be a medical issue . . . ANY addictive behaviour which is detrimental should be, however more research needs to be done into what creates addiction itself, as there are those who are mosty definately predisposed to it, be it genetic, environmental whatever, definitive research just doesn't seem to exist though . . . . many in the media would rather push that Cannabis is highly addictive in comparison with the likes of ANY other drug you can think of . . . which is a total crock! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just for once, I would love to see the headline, “Latest Research Shows Recreational Cannabis Use Is OK” with an explanation that heavy use, like heavy use of anything, will cause problems. I suppose that wouldn’t suit their agenda though or sell newspapers."

 

Are you kidding?

 

Any paper with the headline "Pot is NOT harmful" would fly off the shelves! ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the community in any way you agree to our Terms of Use and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.