Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Supreme Court Halts Pot Appeals


Recommended Posts

In a highly unusual move, the Supreme Court of Canada refused yesterday to proceed with three constitutional appeals to Canada's pot law because Justice Minister Martin Cauchon says he is on the verge of decriminalizing marijuana.

 

One after another, several of Canada's top judges grilled federal lawyer David Frankel, who wanted to go ahead and defend the criminal law that outlaws simple possession and argue that marijuana is a harmful substance.

 

But the judges interjected that Cauchon has said the law's penalties are too harsh and its enforcement too uneven, and appeared baffled by Frankel's explanations that the minister was expressing "a personal view."

 

Cauchon has said a lifelong criminal record that often leaves young people unable to travel to the U.S. or take up certain jobs is too great a penalty. Committees of the Senate and the Commons have said the same thing, and both have urged relaxing the criminal sanctions, although to different degrees.

 

Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin said a key question in the appeals is whether the harm to society or any person by the use of marijuana is sufficient to permit criminalization, and the upcoming examination by Parliament "may well prove to be of relevance to the case, and of interest to the parties, and it may provide guidance to the courts in deciding the present appeals."

 

After less than an hour of argument, and consultation by the judges, McLachlin adjourned the three appeals to the court's spring session, adding their decision "expresses no view on the issues before us."

 

Lawyers for the three individuals challenging the law — two from B.C. and one from Ontario — had also wanted to proceed, heartened by Cauchon's comments that seemed to back their view that the criminalization of marijuana use infringes their right to life, liberty and security of the person.

 

But they were equally heartened by the court's view that the stakes were high.

 

Lawyer Paul Burstein represented former London resident Chris Clay, who was convicted for selling marijuana seeds and seedlings in 1995. Yesterday, he said the court's decision wasn't perhaps a rebuke, but was definitely a signal to the government to clarify its position on the law.

 

Complete Title: Supreme Court Halts Pot Appeals Amid Debate Over Law

 

Source: Toronto Star (CN ON)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the community in any way you agree to our Terms of Use and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.