Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Sativa and Indica: Just Smoke and Mirrors?


Recommended Posts

Original Content @

https://www.marijuana.com/news/2017/10/sativa-and-indica-just-smoke-and-mirrors/

 

 

An unpublished study by Dalhousie University on behalf of the Dutch medical cannabis producer Bedrocan.nl adds another challenge to the long-debated designation of cannabis strains as “Indica,” “Sativa,” and “Hybrid.”

 

Well-known cannabinoid researcher Ethan Russo presented the study at the 9th IACM cannabinoid congress in Cologne, Germany last Friday. The recent study is third scientific work since 2013 that finds there is no basis in science for the widely used modern classification of cannabis strains.

 

Researchers analyzed the genetic makeup of 149 Dutch cannabis samples and found a lack of genetic distinction between “Indica” and “Sativa” samples. In plant taxonomy, specific rules dictate which family, genus, and species are used to categorize a plant. These categorizations help scientists and growers identify plants with similar characteristics and provide an avenue for predicting the traits they’ll carry, such as smell, appearance, and therapeutic properties.

 

When it comes to cannabis, however, the lack of available resources for research over the past few decades has resulted in a deeply-rooted folk taxonomy that oversimplifies the complex makeup of cannabis and disregards what scientists are finding to be the key indicator of a cannabis cultivar’s effects — terpenes.

 

“This study shows that the Indica-Sativa differences could be largely based on terpene content, which instead of the current Indica/Sativa labeling might require more insight into the terpene profiles related to the Bedrocan products available for patient use,” Hugo Maassen, head of the phyto engineering department at Bedrocan.nl, stated in a press release on Friday.

 

Russo is not the first researcher to doubt the naming system adopted by what was once exclusively a black market. As early as 2013, the owner of a test laboratory for medical cannabis with a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the University of Southern California was questioningthe significance of the Indica-Sativa designation of strains purchased in California. Dr. Jeffrey Raber and his staff collected and tested more than 1,000 different samples for a total of 42 substances. The founder of the Werc Shop was sure the classifications had been faulty. Dr. Raber and his team not only found there was no scientific basis for the different “effects” associated with “Sativa” or “Indica,” he also proved that what’s being sold as OG Kush in one shop could be something completely different in another.

 

“Most people don’t even know,” said Dr. Raber when he presented his findings in 2013. “We took a popular name, Jack Herer, and found that most didn’t even look like each other. OG whatever, Kush whatever, and the marketing that goes along with it — it’s not really medically designed.”

 

Two Strains, Similar Genetics

 

In 2015, researchers from the University of British Columbia and Dalhousie University tested medical cannabis from Canada to search  for similarities in the origin and active ingredient profiles of different strains declared as “Indica” or “Sativa.” The Canadian scientists were looking for the origins of different fiber hemp varieties as well as some THC-rich cannabis varieties. Besides the fiber hemp samples, they compared 83 THC-rich strains sourced from licensed Canadian producers and could not find a uniform pattern in either “Sativa” or “Indica” varieties.

 

A “Jamaican Lamb’s Bread” had allegedly 100% Sativa origin, but was genetically almost identical to a pure “Indica” from Afghanistan, confirming Dr. Raber’s 2013 conclusion that common strain names have little scientific or medicinal value.

 

“Cannabis breeders and growers often indicate the percentage of Sativa or Indica in a cannabis strain, but they are not very accurate,” the study’s author, Jonathan Page, explained. “Right now, the genetic identity of a marijuana strain cannot be accurately determined by its name or reported ancestry. Ultimately we require a practical, accurate and more reliable classification system of this plant.”

 

Authorities Missed the Train

 

Authorities around the world have missed many opportunities to address the cannabis classification issue. The prohibitionist attitude toward the plant has made it nearly impossible to create a consistent, unified system for identifying cultivars. Instead, they go by meaningless names in the places like the U.S. and the Netherlands, or a cryptic number, as is the case in Canada.

 

Despite the vast acceptance of medical marijuana in the United States, the federal government classifies cannabis as a drug with “no medicinal value,” which restricts the country’s scientists and researchers from classifying plants in a way that’s more beneficial and clear for medical patients.

 

When the Netherlands passed its medical cannabis program in the Spring of 2014, the Office for Medical Cannabis (OMC) refused to accept any varieties that were already known in coffeeshops and purchased there as herbs. As a result, the breeders with the world’s largest repositories, who had developed many varieties that, since the mid-1980s, have spawned today’s gene pool, were excluded right from the start.

 

Health Canada gave manufacturers the opportunity to obtain strains from patients with an expiring cultivation license during a 2014 transitional period that initially took cultivation out of the hands of patients who were growing their own medicine, and placed it under the purview of producers who lacked adequate seed banks. While pragmatic and compassionate in the short term, it did nothing to address the issue of scientific classification for medical uses.

 

Recreational users have been making do with “Indica,” “Sativa” and “Hybrid” classifications for decades. Just like wine lovers, cannaseurs do not need their passion to be classified scientifically.

 

When it comes to medical cannabis, however, practicing physicians like Bonni Goldstein M.D. would prefer that all products are labeled with cannabinoid potency and terpenoid profiles. “Medical patients and recreational users alike know what works when they use cannabis but often the information of the makeup of that chemovar may be unknown. Knowing what works allows for reproducible results,” said Goldstein.

 

Because consumers have become used to this folk taxonomy in cannabis, a major overhaul will become all the more difficult. Probably almost as difficult as the introduction of the metric system in the United States.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've know terpenoid and flavonoids are intrinsically linked to your subjective high. Almost all modern strains are hybrids. This study would have been better using Land races.

 

All modern strains are hybrid. That lambs breath probably was a Land race hybrid from Jamaica. Most likely "Indian hemp" which is the old classification for basically any cannabis from Asia that got you shit faced aka Americas founding fathers. They loved growing herb, even Washington and Franklin. They kept interesting journals. If they were not cultivating for intoxicating then IDK.

 

It's all about the cannabinoids, terpenoids and flavonoids. I've know this for a very long time. It's just easier to say Indica for compact growing cannabis and sativa for stretchy beasts. Then there is the thc v. Some afghani strains are packed with this. So really apart from rudy and abc it's all 6 degrees of separation.

 

Posted from the OZ Stoners mobile app

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the plants are different in physical appearance and growth cycles, there is no scientific evidence that proves cannabis strains elicit specific results:

 

Indica

This bushy, stout plant sprouts wide leaves. Indica-dominant plants tend to grow faster and bear larger quantities of flowers than sativa plants.

 

Sativa

The sativa plant grows taller than the indica plant and sprouts narrow, wiry leaves that are a lighter shade of green. These plants require more light and take longer to grow and flower.

 

Unfortunately, we’ll likely never know the truth about the genetic origins of cannabis. Even if there were originally two species to start with, they’ve now been interbred to oblivion, owing partially to decades of black-market conditions. Thanks!

Edited by Riyad Brown
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that CBD is a great option in any situation. lol, it helps a lot!

Wow, how much interesting information there is here. I did not even know that it is used in so many fields, plus it has such a large scale on the world market. The first information I read from the given field is from the https://www.the360mag.com/the-history-of-cbd/ a few years ago. Then for the first time I understood what its role really is and plus to all if it is beneficial to the human body not to. But now when I see a scientific study so well reported and with such an analysis, I realize that I really did not know anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are NLD and WLD strains, and then there is Hemp, its a NL with no D or a WL with no D 

Hi all, I'm just a dumb pup, so could you expand the initials please.

The research article was really excellent.

50 odd years of experience rule of thumb; Sativa= energy and paranoia. Indica= sleep with interesting hypnogogic dream imagery.

Last couple of years I've moved from bag seed to bought seed with very mixed results. Marketing hype has never lived up to end product. Some good (few) many crap. More interested in ability to thrive in stealth pots. Have to be kept small and easily moved for hiding.

Live in an area that used to be remote untill few years ago visited by gang (10) of Govt workers with legal authority to enter all properties searching for agripests. Entry refusal results in Police arrest, detention and large fines. At time told them to come back in an hour, gave me time to remove and cut down inground plants. Now everything in pots so they can be hidden inside. They're only allowed to search outside not in houses, sheds, fridges or freezers.

Happy growing friends of the soil.

Graeme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Researchers examined the genetic makeup of 149 Dutch cannabis samples and discovered that there was no genetic distinction between indica and sativa strains. In terms of specific conditions, sativa strains are preferable for psychological problems like as depression, PTSD, and anxiety. Indicas are frequently the most effective for pain and inflammation, making them ideal for those suffering from arthritis, fibromyalgia, and cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the community in any way you agree to our Terms of Use and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.