Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Man who smoked joint after car crash to face court for drug driving


Recommended Posts

Nigel Hill took himself to hospital after a joint failed to relieve the pain he was suffering after a car crash. Now he's been ordered to face court.

View the full article

 

Canberran drivers who smoke marijuana or drink alcohol in the hours after getting out of a crashed car can still be charged, a court says.

Nigel Stuart Hill, 37, lost control of his car and crashed into a tree early one July morning in 2012.

He went home but had no painkillers, so he smoked marijuana instead.

The pain persisted and he went to Calvary Hospital three hours after the crash.

He was blood tested an hour later, and THC was detected.

Hill was charged with a drug driving offence and called before the ACT Magistrates Court, despite there being no evidence that he consumed the drugs before getting behind the wheel.

Drivers can be charged with the offence even if they innocently consume drugs post-driving, but test positive within a relevant period.

That is thought to be an inevitable side-effect of the blood testing regime, which makes it near impossible to distinguish whether someone has consumed the drugs before or after driving.

Typically, “prosecutorial discretion” is used in such cases, or the courts simply give the offender a lighter sentence.

But Hill’s lawyer, Paul Edmonds, argued that in this case the blood sample was taken outside the two hour time limit he said was permitted by law.

He also argued his client was not defined as a “driver involved in an accident” because he broke the continuity between the crash and the hospital by going home.

The magistrate accepted that argument and threw out the charge against Hill.

But the decision was appealed by the Crown to the Supreme Court, which handed down its decision on Friday morning.

It overturned the magistrate’s decision, and Hill will now be forced back to the Magistrates Court to deal with the drug driving charge.

They found there to be a much longer time limit than the two hours Hill claimed.

The Supreme Court found an offence had been committed when a person crashes their car, attends hospital within six hours, gives a blood sample within the next two hours, and drugs are detected.

Hill will now face the ACT Magistrates Court at a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the community in any way you agree to our Terms of Use and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.