Victoria cop calls to legalize drugs

[grace]

Cops like David Bratzer are a rare breed.

 

Think of the late Gil Puder. A distinguished Vancouver police officer, Puder called for an end to the war on drugs while he was in active service during the late 1990s and continued to do so despite threats of disciplinary action from his superiors.

 

Or the recently retired West Vancouver police chief Kash Heed. At one time, while he was still with the Vancouver police, Heed, according to Bratzer, also spoke about the legalization of drugs.

 

Bratzer has been with the Victoria police for only three years, and already the 31-year-old officer has stepped forward to question the basis of the country’s drug laws.

 

“As a police officer, you always want to help people, so it’s very frustrating to be a police officer and enforce laws that are not necessarily helpful,” Bratzer told the Georgia Straight by phone.

 

Last month, he addressed participants in a cannabis convention held at the University of Victoria, where he presented his proposals for a post-prohibition era.

 

Step one, he said, is to legalize all drugs. Step two is for the provincial government to regulate drugs in the same way it regulates alcohol. Step three, he continued, is to decide what to do with the “peace dividend” or the funds that government can save by stopping the war on drugs.

 

Bratzer also told participants at the convention, which was organized by the International Hempology 101 Society, that among the things guaranteed in a war-on-drugs regime is criminal activity. This comes from both drug users in need of money for a quick fix and organized-crime groups involved in the production and distribution of drugs, he said.

 

Coming out to speak about these things as a volunteer with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition—a Massachusetts-based group composed of current and former members of the police and justice communities—isn’t easy.

 

“It’s been mixed,” Bratzer said when asked about the reaction of his Victoria police colleagues. He stressed that his views are entirely his own and do not reflect the position of the police department.

 

He also has two older brothers who are with the Victoria police. “We have talked about it,” Bratzer said. “They understand that I have my own opinions and they respect that. They don’t necessarily agree with me but they respect my right to free speech.”

 

The Straight caught up with B.C. solicitor general John van Dongen earlier this month at a private screening of A Warrior’s Religion, a documentary dealing with gangs in the South Asian community. When asked about the prospects of legalization, van Dongen said: “That is a federal issue and certainly the Conservative government has made their position clear that they’re not going there.”

 

Where Canada’s war on drugs may lead to in the future worries Tony Smith, a retired 28-year veteran of the Vancouver Police Department and also a LEAP member.

 

In Mexico, Smith noted, drug cartels have grown so powerful with profits from the drug trade that they can either buy off police, judges, and politicians or kill them at will.

 

“What’s really the difference here and there?” Smith asked in a phone interview with the Straight.

 

In the U.S., according to Smith, there’s much talk about drug corruption among law enforcers. That may not be the case in Canada, but he warned that once it starts happening here, “you won’t know which policemen are under the pay of the drug people and which policemen aren’t” and “it’s a very thin line once you approach that point.”

 

Referring to the ongoing turf war among gangs here in the Lower Mainland, Smith noted that drug lords now don’t seem to care about “what level of violence they’re using amongst themselves”.

 

What if, Smith asked, somebody comes “stepping out of the line and thinks, ‘Well, you know, screw it. I’m in a bit of a problem here. I’ll just take out the policeman or the judge or whatever.’ And once that occurs, then we’ll have total anarchy.”

 

The war on drugs

> Share of enforcement-related activities in Canada’s drug strategy: 75 percent

 

> Share of drug-related criminal charges in Canadian courts in 2002: 23 percent

 

> Cost associated with drug cases before the courts in 2002: $330 million

 

> Policing costs for drug enforcement in 2002: $1.43 billion

 

> Correctional-service costs associated with drugs in 2002: $573 million

 

> Canadians reporting having used illicit drugs during their life in 1994: 28.5 percent

 

> Canadians reporting illicit-drug use during their life in 2004: 45 percent

 

Source: “Canada’s 2003 renewed drug strategy—an evidence-based review”, published in the HIV/AIDS Policy and Law Review’s December 2006 edition

 

Should we encourage police officers to express openly their views regarding prohibition?

 

Tom Stamatakis

President, B.C. Police Association

 

“Freedom of speech is a core value that we hold dear. I don’t have an issue with it. Everybody should be entitled to express their opinion. As a retired person, you’re entitled to comment on any issue. When you’re employed, I think you’re still entitled to hold your own personal views. You just might want to be careful on how you express your views and make clear that these are your personal views and not reflective of your employer’s views. That’s where I think the conflict comes from—when that distinction is not made clear.”

 

Tony Smith

Retired Vancouver constable

 

“A lot of senior police officers, and by ‘senior’ I mean both in rank and years in service, believe that we have the solution, although they won’t come out and say it. It seems there’s a lot of politics being played. It’s just been so long established that these [drugs] are supposed to be bad. And also, of course, to some extent some of them, if they were to agree, would be saying that everything that they’ve done in their careers was a waste of time, which is a kind of hard thing to swallow.”

 

Indira Prahst

Langara College sociology instructor

 

“There is a code of silence in the police force where indeed police officers cannot openly express their views. Their insight into hands-on experiences in the field of law enforcement that we in the public don’t have access to is so valuable, and I wish the police would have more freedom around it. I think the police should be participants in a prohibition dialogue around pros and cons and from the viewpoint of police as opposed to constantly taking the position of, you know, ‘Let’s not legalize marijuana.’ ”

 

David MacAlister

SFU criminology professor

 

“Most police departments have a policy where they let their media-relations people do all the talking. The police like to manage the public’s perception of the police as carefully as possible. It’s almost getting into the political realm if individual police officers are speaking out about whether any particular law should be in place or not. I can see how police management and maybe their political masters would probably think that’s not appropriate for police officers…believing that these are matters that are best left to politicians.”

Author: Carlito Pablo

Date: 19 March 2009

Source: straight.com

http://www.straight.com/article-206649/cop...-legalize-drugs

[mull]

“A lot of senior police officers, and by ‘senior’ I mean both in rank and years in service, believe that we have the solution, although they won’t come out and say it. It seems there’s a lot of politics being played. It’s just been so long established that these [drugs] are supposed to be bad. And also, of course, to some extent some of them, if they were to agree, would be saying that everything that they’ve done in their careers was a waste of time, which is a kind of hard thing to swallow.”

 

Pride be hard to swallow? Like the fact their jobs need not exist.. perhaps a vested interest WOD then

[Alison Myrden]

Pride be hard to swallow? Like the fact their jobs need not exist.. perhaps a vested interest WOD then

 

I doubt it. These Police Officers need to make a living as much as anyone and they should be commended for their bravery in speaking out. I am PROUD to be a Retired Law Enforcement Officer and an accepted Speaker for LEAP. I am also their Leading Female Speaker at that.

 

Give these men and women a break. It takes GUTS to go against what your Superiors believe....

 

 

Alison Myrden

Leading Female Speaker for LEAP

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

http://www.leap.cc

[Radic]

irey sista

your right

people like that should be the rule

not the exception

the insanity of this shituation astounds me

like Murra

most cops that ever talk to me have sworn an oath to bust me for growing and producing my own cannabis medicines

i have been criminalized and continue to be so, as we speak,

i suffer the persecution indignation and downpression from cops most days

 

so when some cop starts to blows a whistle

well

i hafe support dat

yes i

brave move

 

the war on drugs is still raging against the people

cops are not my enemy

yet i am theirs

 

so i have learned to never trust cops

and thats where dis is coming from

forgive we

it may take some time to process

 

we will never forget

but

we will forgive

 

irey guidance

[I-Sis Nyah]

QUOTE

“A lot of senior police officers, and by ‘senior’ I mean both in rank and years in service, believe that we have the solution, although they won’t come out and say it. It seems there’s a lot of politics being played. It’s just been so long established that these [drugs] are supposed to be bad. And also, of course, to some extent some of them, if they were to agree, would be saying that everything that they’ve done in their careers was a waste of time, which is a kind of hard thing to swallow.”

 

 

 

 

Pride be hard to swallow? Like the fact their jobs need not exist.. perhaps a vested interest WOD then

 

 

Blessed Love n Justice for all

Yah know, I think Marra has a good point

personally, I think the reason most police are so reticient to support Cannabis law reform and in fact the change from treating drug or illegal Herb users as criminals to dealing with the issues as the health issues they really are -

IS jobs,

yes the main reason the police fullheartedly supported criminalization in the first place, beside the inherent racism, is the fact that huge task forces were then already set up to crack down in the alcohol trade,

that was a dismal failure and so the criminalization of Cannabis was the perfect replacement to keep these "drug task forces" in their jobs.....

legalizing Herb and other "illicit drugs" will have the effect of downsizing a lot of police jobs and that not something the majority of them want now is it?

ok so the likes of us will be much more employable but hey, we are so mellow and peaceful, really police have nothing to fear from us.....

so what is in it for them?

feelings of righteousness?

unemployed honorbility?

thats not going to wash with many cops now is it?

Got to say though, massive raspect to the ones who stand up and be counted, Icidering what's at stake for them........

they really ARE heroes in my book...

as my Radic quoted my sentiment in the above post.......

it amazes me that the majority still go along with the current shituation

Icidering the evidence now available

if thats not corruption on a massive scale, what is??????????

[Koselitz]

I hope that more caps realize this real situation: legalize!