Full Version: too strong to smoke
i read about a year ago that canada was trying to grow a standard marijuana plant for all medicinal marijuana users in america. the article said that they had been working on it for 2 or 3 years when they breed a strain that had like 75% THC. i think they tried it out and the test subjects were freaking out and showing signs of skitzophrenia(spl) after just a few hits. has anybody else heard of this? is so, do you know what kind it was? because i want to get some of that shit.
Naa never heard of it but I would say from the sounds of it that it is just another "myth"
peopel smoke higher percentages than that all the time , Hash and oil would both constatute themselfs as containign over 90% thc even if your not the best at makign it
there are plenty of "knock you off your ass" strains out there though , if thats the stone your lookign for I sugest a heavy indica ,
when mjoz opens again they have sensi star which I think is a great plant to grow as it's hardy , big , not too fussy and has a great stone
peopel smoke higher percentages than that all the time , Hash and oil would both constatute themselfs as containign over 90% thc even if your not the best at makign it
there are plenty of "knock you off your ass" strains out there though , if thats the stone your lookign for I sugest a heavy indica ,
when mjoz opens again they have sensi star which I think is a great plant to grow as it's hardy , big , not too fussy and has a great stone
it could be a myth. i read it on aol i think. thanks for the good weed though. my personal favorite is a sativa. i like the body stone the indica gives me, but i get messed up off of a sative.
If you find out what that 75% stuff is tell me, i want some too.
But yeah, it sounds like a myth... damnit! :thumbdown
But yeah, it sounds like a myth... damnit! :thumbdown
White Widow is one of the most potent strains at a claimed 16% THC.
As Pure said the very high THC content preparations tend to be oil & hash.
If a plant was 75% THC then there wouldnt be much plant or surface area to hold all those trichromes & if there was enough plant matter, the light would have alot of difficulty penetrating the dense layer of trichs.
I think the 75% THC plant would be somewhere near a yowies hideout, next to a billabong with a bunyip in it!!
As Pure said the very high THC content preparations tend to be oil & hash.
If a plant was 75% THC then there wouldnt be much plant or surface area to hold all those trichromes & if there was enough plant matter, the light would have alot of difficulty penetrating the dense layer of trichs.
I think the 75% THC plant would be somewhere near a yowies hideout, next to a billabong with a bunyip in it!!
...@ rosscopico0
good one.I was reading "Marijuana Questions? Ask Ed - The Encyclopedia (sic) of Marijuana" today, (not bad, but a few glaring errors which could end up killing plants in there) and came across another MJ myth I thought was too funny not to share...
QUOTE
"NEW YORK WHITE"
Dear Ed,
In The Anarchist Cookbook I recently read of a type of marijuana called "New York White," which is supposed to grow in large amounts in the sewers of New York. These plants are supposed to be about twelve feet tall and are bleached white in color due to lack of sunlight. They are said to be responsible for poor drainage and flooding in the city. It all sounds like bullshit to me. What do you think?
I have another question. I have often read that marijuana is a common-problem weed. It is accusted of taking over unkempt fields and vacant lots. I wish I had such problems. I have searched many fields and all through the woods without any luck. Do you have any explainations?
Big Boy,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Green plants carry on their life processes by using the energy from the sun to produce sugars from carbon dioxide, which is found in the air and water. Without light the plants cannot produce sugar and they die. There are some plants, such as yeast and fungi, which live by utilising sugars and other organic matter produced by other organisms. But marijuana and other green plants cannot function that way. I have heard rumors of New York White for many years. Whenever I have tried to trace back the rumor, I was unable to locate anyone who actually claimed to have seen or smoked the stuff. I think it's a hoax.
Marijuana is a common weed, but only in places where it is already established. It readily colonises abandoned construction sites and areas cleared by nature. In the United States, these areas are found primarily in the Midwest.
Dear Ed,
In The Anarchist Cookbook I recently read of a type of marijuana called "New York White," which is supposed to grow in large amounts in the sewers of New York. These plants are supposed to be about twelve feet tall and are bleached white in color due to lack of sunlight. They are said to be responsible for poor drainage and flooding in the city. It all sounds like bullshit to me. What do you think?
I have another question. I have often read that marijuana is a common-problem weed. It is accusted of taking over unkempt fields and vacant lots. I wish I had such problems. I have searched many fields and all through the woods without any luck. Do you have any explainations?
Big Boy,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Green plants carry on their life processes by using the energy from the sun to produce sugars from carbon dioxide, which is found in the air and water. Without light the plants cannot produce sugar and they die. There are some plants, such as yeast and fungi, which live by utilising sugars and other organic matter produced by other organisms. But marijuana and other green plants cannot function that way. I have heard rumors of New York White for many years. Whenever I have tried to trace back the rumor, I was unable to locate anyone who actually claimed to have seen or smoked the stuff. I think it's a hoax.
Marijuana is a common weed, but only in places where it is already established. It readily colonises abandoned construction sites and areas cleared by nature. In the United States, these areas are found primarily in the Midwest.
Now that's a myth.
I read something on these white flowers awhile ago, Apparently and I think its bullshit myself.
But apparently it is TRUE the plants get enough light to grow and produce the sugars etc from where Im not sure but maybe the plant grow near light sources.
the height of the plnats is the plant trying to get closer to the light source.
The white flowers are caused by the sewerage and are very low in THC. almost like a hemp type plant.
not something Im keen to smoke.
But apparently it is TRUE the plants get enough light to grow and produce the sugars etc from where Im not sure but maybe the plant grow near light sources.
the height of the plnats is the plant trying to get closer to the light source.
The white flowers are caused by the sewerage and are very low in THC. almost like a hemp type plant.
not something Im keen to smoke.
I find some bubble hash 2 strong if you smoke 2 much. Does not hit you straight away - about 20mins after your had a session and I start 2 go on the nod - total lounge lock for about two hours.
Jack
Jack
75 % thc :reallyexcited: would be nice if true
I will add Ed isnt always correct
I wrote him a letter pulling him up on a few things last year
He agreed and sent me a freee book nice one ED Rosenthal except i would of prefered he sent me the big book of buds there was nothing in this book i didnt already know
I thought some of the highest hash was only around 50% anyways
MMMMMMMMMM Bubble yummmmmmmmyyy
P.S dont take seed bank thc levels at face value.
I will add Ed isnt always correct
I wrote him a letter pulling him up on a few things last year
He agreed and sent me a freee book nice one ED Rosenthal except i would of prefered he sent me the big book of buds there was nothing in this book i didnt already know
I thought some of the highest hash was only around 50% anyways
MMMMMMMMMM Bubble yummmmmmmmyyy
P.S dont take seed bank thc levels at face value.
looks like a good book mate.
yea I got in the shit along time ago quoting shit I didnt know about from his book.
He has alot to learn hey.
I will have to have a look at the book sometime, hopefully hes given you credit where credit is due mate.
yea I got in the shit along time ago quoting shit I didnt know about from his book
.He has alot to learn hey.
I will have to have a look at the book sometime, hopefully hes given you credit where credit is due mate.
Hey ferengi
If you want the book just pm me your safe addy and ill send to you on monday!!
If you want the book just pm me your safe addy and ill send to you on monday!!
Yeah, I've got a copy of that one, a tad outdated now, but there's still a fair amount of info.
Like Tartass, it was little I didn't know already, but a good read nonetheless.
Like Tartass, it was little I didn't know already, but a good read nonetheless.
Hey ferengi
If you want the book just pm me your safe addy and ill send to you on monday!!
done mate, Im always reading everything I can get my hands on.
thanks again. :thumbsup :reallyexcited:
If you want the book just pm me your safe addy and ill send to you on monday!!
done mate, Im always reading everything I can get my hands on
.thanks again. :thumbsup :reallyexcited:
the most potent stuff is called budder and it is an extract that contains 99.7% THC!
There have been 3 tests on budder in various universetys and it is true!
Budder is crazy, just ask about it on the Cannabis Culture forums!
ive heard its the SHIZBIZZLE DAYM!
There have been 3 tests on budder in various universetys and it is true!
Budder is crazy, just ask about it on the Cannabis Culture forums!
ive heard its the SHIZBIZZLE DAYM!
:: :: ::
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3589.html
its basically Honey Oil. and some clown thinks he made it first. first of all he named the animals honey oil, then he named another Glass, then he renamed it to budder.
but read this and tell me if you disagree, its good old AUSSIE honey oil.
its just more of a butter consistancy, and is SOLVENT extracted.
:thumbsup
: :: :: http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3589.html
its basically Honey Oil. and some clown thinks he made it first. first of all he named the animals honey oil, then he named another Glass, then he renamed it to budder.
but read this and tell me if you disagree, its good old AUSSIE honey oil.
its just more of a butter consistancy, and is SOLVENT extracted.
QUOTE
The same kind of buzz is happening around BudderKing. Although hashish oils and other concentrates have existed for many years, nobody has been willing to publicly promote a solvent-extracted cannabis product. Until now.
:thumbsup
The methods of making budder are kept under lock and key no one except budder king knows how it is made, it is solvent extraced but it dosent have a honey oil like consistancy to it
Hmm iam sur ethere was a claim a while ago by some Dutch company that they had perfected 100% thc resin extract method, ill try and find the thred it sounded yummie
It's only a matter of time before we have some super strong thc producing plants though. X-pat made a post not that long ago about some japanese researchers who've found the THC synthase genes, which can be translocated into just about any plant you can consider, or super-production can be stimulated, or even cannabinoid profile specific work could be possible.
That's GM though, and some people have problems with that. It may offer a heck of a big boost to the industry though...
You can isomerise lesser cannabinoids into pure thc with certain chemical processes, this may be how he's ensuring only thc in the end product. Still, honey oil is more than strong enough for me. And it only takes leaf to make it.
That's GM though, and some people have problems with that. It may offer a heck of a big boost to the industry though...
You can isomerise lesser cannabinoids into pure thc with certain chemical processes, this may be how he's ensuring only thc in the end product. Still, honey oil is more than strong enough for me. And it only takes leaf to make it.
QUOTE
It's only a matter of time before we have some super strong thc producing plants though. X-pat made a post not that long ago about some japanese researchers who've found the THC synthase genes, which can be translocated into just about any plant you can consider, or super-production can be stimulated, or even cannabinoid profile specific work could be possible.
i can't wait until there is a genetic mutation that creates a super production rate in cannabis plants... Or what would be hella funny, THC in common lawn grass but super production would be better.
let me qoute somethings from the article.its not 99.7%thc whats written is"The top Budder sample was 99.6% pure,"
and its thc % is written as"Hornby's tests also found Budder contains 80 to 90% of its cannabinoids as THC. "
and its thc % is written as"Hornby's tests also found Budder contains 80 to 90% of its cannabinoids as THC. "
with the synthasising thc genetic material into other things...just curious as to why the dutch don't have smokeable tulips ? ...
I don't see it as impossible...i just want to know why some stoner with a degree hadn't already done it ?! haha then again...if you had smokeable tulips...im sure you would be hard pressed attempting a scientific report of any degree..more likely to be working on the perfect cow for the perfect hamburger...
:jawdrop:
...I don't see it as impossible...i just want to know why some stoner with a degree hadn't already done it ?! haha then again...if you had smokeable tulips...im sure you would be hard pressed attempting a scientific report of any degree..more likely to be working on the perfect cow for the perfect hamburger...
:jawdrop:
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.